
No one knows you like you know yourself and there is no such thing as a perfect job. He did not coin either phrase but with these two, Marcus Buckingham hooked me. Before reading his books, I had a vague awareness of Marcus Buckingham as the co-author of First, Break All The Rules: What The Worlds Greatest Managers Do Differently and as a coach. I assumed that his message would be pie in the sky, simplistic and rah-rah. Instead, I found Buckingham’s career advice contrary, pragmatic and practical and I think his approach is particularly relevant to gifted adults at work.
Overview of Marcus Buckingham’s Approach
- Buckingham says we mistakenly fixate on overcoming our weaknesses rather than building on our strengths. From the school to corporate ’performance management’, we live in a society that institutionalizes a focus on what we’re not good at. Buckingham argues that this doesn’t work. Instead, he says we should start with our strengths. What about the satisfaction experienced by mastering something you are weak in? Buckingham says you may achieve mastery in areas you are weak but you will never feel as good doing it and you will likely achieve greater mastery in areas of natural strength.
- To Buckingham, a strength is not necessarily something you are good at but rather something you feel satisfied doing. A strength is where you feel invigorated and energized. A weakness is something that leaves you feeling drained and depleted. Many of us have things we’re good at, may even be pigeon-holed into doing but you don’t enjoy. If the majority of your work day is spent on tasks that are intrinsically energizing, work will be meaningful. To Buckingham strengths and weaknesses have no value judgment nor are they determined by other people, they are simply what energizes you and drains you personally.
- Everyone has their own unique composition of strengths and weaknesses. If we really think about it, we know (and ultimately only we know) what energizes and depletes us. Buckingham points out that other people in our life, often well meaning people who love us, who may think they know better what we should do with our career, what are strengths are. However, at the end of the day, only you know how you feel and the person who has the most invested in your career (or anything else), is you, not your boss, your partner or your family.
- Don’t know what energizes or drains you? Or maybe you think you know. But do you really know, specifically? Buckingham recommends tracking how you feel relative to the different tasks for a week. This will provide a roadmap of what energizes and drains you: your strengths and weaknesses.
- Buckingham says there is no perfect job for you. I say, that may be an overstatement but it’s highly unlikely you’re going to find a job description that matches your unique set of strengths and weaknesses. Particularly if you’re a gifted adult. You will need to carve out a job that serves your individual strengths and allows you to work within your weaknesses.
Why I Liked Marcus Buckingham’s Approach
- It was grounded in the real world. He didn’t suggest that there’s a perfect life or a perfect happiness, in fact, he explicitly says the opposite. For the most part, Buckingham avoids jargon and abstract language. Instead, he says, if you focus on what you feel good doing and move incrementally towards doing more of it, you will perform better and, in turn, have the opportunity to do more of what you enjoy doing.
- Buckingham balances his recommendation to move towards your strengths by recognizing it’s equally important to understand your weaknesses. Focusing on your strengths and will likely mean you will deal with your weaknesses more effectively, however, your weaknesses will always be there. Understanding and working within the limits of you weaknesses contributes to your success.
- Understanding your strengths and weaknesses is not as straightforward as it seems. A friend of mine who has worked with a certified Marcus Buckingham coach and has attended Marcus Buckingham’s workshops clarified this for me. Understanding your strengths and weaknesses requires some thought. For example, I said to my friend, “Aha. Meetings. I hate meetings. Meetings are my weakness. I spend the vast majority of my time in meetings, they drain me and that is my problem with my job”. And my friend said, “Are you sure it’s meetings you don’t like? Is it all meetings? Or conference calls? Or large meetings? Or meetings without a clear agenda? Have you ever been to a meeting you liked? What made that meeting different?” So in working through your strengths and weaknesses, don’t throw the baby out with the bath, drill down and work it through – if you were to change one element of something that leaves you feeling lousy, could it then be energizing?
- I’m reluctant to use the cliche ‘it’s not about the destination but the journey’ but unfortunately, I’m unable to find an alternative because I think that’s Buckingham’s point. We get so caught up in where we’re going, achievement, fixing what’s wrong, that we overlook the fact that, in the meantime, we’re not enjoying what we’re doing.
So What Does Marcus Buckingham Have to Do with Gifted Adults?
- This approach makes sense for people like myself who have always been completely stymied by the standard guidance counsellor/performance management question: where do you see yourself in 5 years? I’ve never had a clue – the only answer I’ve had is: something different than I’m doing now. Buckingham has an example of a woman who, through trial and error, ultimately would up in a job she enjoyed as talent agent. She didn’t enjoy all the jobs she had getting there but there was a growing sense of clarity and fundamental confidence in her direction as she worked towards doing what energized her. She didn’t have a plan or a goal but through trial and error moved towards incorporating less of her weaknesses and more of her strengths. Buckingham’s approach doesn’t require a goal or plan which is relief to someone like me with many, many interests and total lack of interest in traditional career paths.
- The talents, interests and capabilities of the gifted adults I know defy any job description I’ve ever seen. Buckingham provides a method of creating your own job description, specific to your unique talents, interests and capabilities.
- Some gifted adults, like myself on a bad day, get overwhelmed by what many other people find tolerable. I have the potential to find bureaucracy, inefficiency, task repetition, workplace immorality truly soul sucking. While I may never eliminate any of these from my life, Buckingham’s concepts provide a roadmap for me to prevent reaching the point of feeling totally hollowed out.
- Gifted adults may have talents that are not readily recognized or appreciated in the workplace. Receiving negative or conflicting feedback, a gifted adult may lose confidence in which direction to head. Using this approach, the compass is your intrinsic strengths and weaknesses, as a result, you can filter the external feedback appropriately.
- For gifted stay at home moms, Buckingham’s ideas provide a basis for integrating more intellectual satisfaction, whether it’s toward the eventual return to paid work or simply a more satisfying life. At the very least, it hedges against that emptied out, “I’ve given until I’ve got nothing left and my brain has completely atrophied’ feeling.
- Buckingham suggests that you can try as hard as you want to contort yourself into a job that doesn’t align with your strengths but ultimately ‘the truth will out’. If, fundamentally, how you spend your time, at work or otherwise, drains you rather than energizes you, there will be a price, whether you wind up burning yourself out and sabotaging yourself in the workplace or inducing stress related illness or simply sleepwalking through work (and maybe your life), For a gifted adult at work who pretends to be less than they are, knows less and cares less than they do, will feel drained and depleted and Buckingham suggests that in the end, this cannot be sustained. Something will give.
It seems so obvious: understand what is intrinsically satisfying to you and what is not. Know that only you can know what energizes you and drains you. What energizes and drains you personally is different than anyone elses strengths and weaknesses. Hold tight to this in your life even in the face of other people telling you otherwise because only you know what that is for you. But take the time to REALLY understand what your personal strengths and weaknesses are and don’t ‘throw the baby out with the bath’. By the way, Buckingham provides more practical methods for integrating your personal strengths at work whether it’s within your existing job or making a career change than I’ve provided here. It may seem simple but it is completely the opposite of what most of us have been taught all of our lives: school, our personal lives and work are often based on ‘fixing the problem’ focused on what a person is missing rather than what they have.
My knowledge of Marcus Buckingham, while enthusiastic, is limited. I have a lot of questions that I will ask of someone who has worked with Marcus Buckingham for the past 10 years. If you have any questions, you would like asked, please add a comment and I will be sure to include them as well and post the answers back to the site, regardless of whether your questions are skeptical or enthusiastic.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=5164a47c-10cd-4b61-8ab7-6721fd19fdb5)
{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }
Wow! Lead with your strengths, take what anyone says you “should” do with a grain of salt– couldn’t agree more.
My, what a thrilling way to look at things.
“A strength is where you feel invigorated and energized.” and not simply what you are good at. I absolutely agree on this. I find a lot more stamina for projects I’m invigorated by and can work through hunger pangs and tiredness when I’m working on an area of strength (like writing or photography or doing nature study/science projects with the kids).
I have been the same way, in the sense that I can’t project 5 years into the future. Based on my past performance, I’d had 3 job changes every 3-5 years (same field, the biosciences, but vastly different sub-fields), so it’s difficult to know where I’d want to be in 5 years time. I would experience burn-out about the 3-5 year mark. While there were some aspects I was thoroughly energized by (such as training others or giving laboratory tours to visitors and therefore basically imparting my knowledge of my area of expertise to others in a very lively, inspiring way – from young kids to professionals who came by the lab), there was much I was drained by: the beauracracy, the endless amount of samples to process, the fact that colleagues didn’t pull their weight on the boring but necessarily tasks).
I think…perhaps this is the single most valuable thing imparted to me recently. It’s more than a glib “do what you love”, but more thoughtful and practical. I think perhaps I need to find out more about this and find a way to incorporate what works for me best and create a job around that.
Thank you so much for sharing. I think this is really fabulous. I really do appreciate your blog and your thoughts. The gears are really turning now…
One of the other things Buckingham mentions is the ‘paralysis of choice’ – in so many ways, those of us who live in North America are so lucky because we have so many choices. At the same time it can be paralyzing, particularly if you’re a gifted adult who is able (or just wants to) do everything at a high level. The overload of choice can shut some of us down I think. As well as the lack of models. I have been seeking the ‘perfect’ job description (or even the ‘not perfect but a sliver of hope job description) for more the 20 years and haven’t found it yet. If nothing else, I now know I should give up looking for it. Have you ever received career counselling that you found helpful?
(And I don’t mean to hog the scene. Please give your comments this, folks.) To answer Elisa’s question: No. The closest thing was in high school (they gave us aptitude tests and I scored uniformly high across the board): “You’re qualified in everything, do whatever you want.” (At least they were positive.) The quality of any career guidance I’ve gotten after that has been down-hill, truth be told.
Hey Elisa – Great Blogsite! Erika told me about it a few weeks ago. I went on right away and read a blog on giftedness and creativity but couldn’t finish my comment in time to send it! So I copied it to my desktop to complete and submit in a timely fashion but then I got busy doing a bunch of stuff, and only now am sitting down to complete all partially-done business for the month of October
So, first my apologies for off-topic-ness and then, if you would indulge me, a brief comment on that previous post whose comments option has now been closed (I think). Ultimately, it all ties in, so here goes..
My honours thesis in psychology was an analysis on the correlation between creativity and anxiety. I had a hunch that those ‘gifted’ with higher levels of creativity would generally be more anxious than those less gifted, owing perhaps to a more advanced ability to imagine worst-case scenarios (and bring them to life in your mind’s eye). Of course, as with ‘giftedness’ there are many measures of creativity and forms it can take, so I focused on one – artistic creativity. As causality could not be shown (i.e. I am not anxious BECAUSE I’m creative or vice versa), I focused on correlation and compared fine arts majors (artistically gifted) to mathematics majors (less ‘creative’ and therefore less ‘anxious’). I found a correlation, albeit weak and primed for more rigorous testing, that supported my thesis: The fine arts majors had higher levels of state (situational) and trait (personality-based) anxiety than mathematics majors. Was it due to a generally more active, creative (read ‘gifted’) imagination? Do creatively gifted, artistic people tend to fixate on areas of life that they cannot control rather than letting things happen and unfold naturally? Were the results biased? Is there a more accurate measure of creative intelligence out there? Relax, I tell myself; interesting results but it was undergrad. Perhaps the answers may not be far down the road, however, based on current research trends.
(Okay, now we’re caught up to present day)
The Star has been doing a series on education, learning and brain development, focusing on neuro-education and mapping those parts of the brain accessed during learning. From the Sunday Star today (Nov 1st), I read about a Professor (John Geake), whose neuroscience research has lead to some very interesting results, particularly as it relates to gifted children and how to teach them. The link below is to an article on creative intelligence and the education of gifted children, and provides a cognitive model of creative intelligence:
http://www.brookes.ac.uk/schools/education/recon/rf-vol2-1.pdf
This next site is UK-based for those involved with parenting and teaching gifted children and looks to be very interesting:
http://www.pegy.org.uk/index.html
Once again, sorry for not staying on topic. I’ll read the actual post now. Ironically, I am going through a career change as we speak, so this topic is perfect timing for me. I’ve rarely felt fully connected to any of the things I’ve done since high school. Perhaps it has to do with having so many interests and pretty good ability in such a diverse number of fields that committing to one would’ve meant missing out on another… Wait a sec! I just read a line that you wrote above, quoting ‘paralysis of choice’ – crrraaazzy! I can’t wait to read the post! Thinking you have all the time in the world for everything you want to do doesn’t work anymore. Whatever it is, I’m slowly getting it down. And I know there is a path – that is the beautiful thing! It also helps to have blogs like yours to reference for ideas and insights along the way!
Keep up the great work!
Billy
(I can’t find a ‘contact’ tab – email me when you get a chance.)
I once heard a sermon that said essentially this — the pastor must have been reading this at the time.
You might also like Dan Pink’s TED lecture on internal vs. external motivation. I think it really applies to picking work.